Hitmaker Engineering

Services · Phase 5

Manufacturing transfer and commercialization for medical devices and combination products.

Move from development into production, suppliers, assembly, test, and launch — with DFM/DFA, process validation, supplier qualification, and launch-risk reduction in parallel rather than in sequence.

When teams call us in

  • A product is approaching design freeze and manufacturing readiness is uncertain.
  • DFM/DFA gaps are surfacing late and tooling or process risk is climbing.
  • A supplier or contract manufacturer is being onboarded and process readiness needs to be assessed.
  • A launch is approaching and the team needs a launch-risk reduction plan that ties product, process, and regulatory.

How we approach it

  • Design-for-manufacture in parallel with design controls, not after design freeze.
  • Process capability and supplier qualification driven by critical-to-quality flow-down — not just first-piece inspection.
  • Launch readiness measured across product, process, supplier, documentation, and regulatory dimensions.
  • Scale-up planning that addresses real volume risk: tooling life, fixturing, automation, yield, and supplier capacity.

Typical deliverables

  • Manufacturing transfer plan and gating.
  • DFM/DFA review and remediation plan.
  • Process FMEA aligned to ISO 14971 and the design risk file.
  • Supplier qualification plan and audit readiness.
  • Process validation strategy (IQ/OQ/PQ) with control plans and capability studies.
  • Launch readiness assessment with named risk owners.

Frequently asked questions

When should manufacturing engagement start?
Earlier than most programs assume. DFM and process readiness are most valuable while the design is still tractable. Treating manufacturing transfer as a hand-off after design freeze is the single most common cause of late-stage rework, late tooling changes, and slipped launches. We engage during design engineering when possible and lead the formal transfer when the program is ready.
Do you work with internal manufacturing or contract manufacturers?
Both. We have led transfers into internal sites and into contract manufacturers, and have run engineering ownership opposite both. The mechanics are similar; the politics, documentation, and supplier-management posture differ — and we structure the engagement accordingly.
How do you handle process validation?
Process validation (IQ/OQ/PQ) is structured against critical-to-quality flow-down from the design risk file, not first-piece inspection. We design the validation strategy alongside the manufacturing process so PFMEA, control plans, capability studies, and validation protocols form one consistent package — not parallel deliverables.
Can you support scale-up beyond the initial launch volume?
Yes. The principals have led scale-up at unit volumes from prototype quantities through 300K–1M unit/year, including 50–75% unit-cost reduction work via design and process optimization. Scale-up planning addresses tooling life, fixturing, automation, yield, and supplier capacity in parallel — not as serial concerns.

Preparing for transfer or launch?

Engagements typically start with a scoping call to map the transfer plan, supplier posture, and launch timeline.

Start a Product Development Conversation